Van Sijl | Coaching & training for academics
  • Home
  • Services
  • Free tools
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to Mail

What is a PhD anyway?

July 17, 2015/1 Comment/in PhD, Philosophy/by Claartje van Sijl

Starting on a PhD project, every PhD student will have some ideas about what a PhD entails, but most never get to explicitly investigate how they actually conceptualize it. Do you consider your PhD a process, or a product? Is it your life’s work, a stepping stone, an academic ritual…? Your answer to the question ‘What is a PhD anyway?‘ has a far-reaching influence on your definition of success, on your motivation and self-confidence, on how you engage with your research project, not to mention how it influences the way you position yourself with respect to others both during and after your PhD.

Recently, the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, KNAW for short, organized an event for its PhD candidates, themed How to Grow a PhD. As part of this event, I facilitated short Socratic conversations on the phenomenon of the PhD. Starting point was the question What is a PhD anyway? This is a summary of one of these conversations.

We started out by listing the initial intuitions of all participants, followed by a brief round of questions for clarification:

  • a PhD is a masterpiece of a craftsman that qualifies him/her for membership of the academic guild
  • a PhD is the coolest job: pragmatically speaking it allows for much flexibility (e.g. with respect to caring for small children) and it contains lots of possibilities for learning and professional development.
  • a PhD is a training to be an independent researcher
  • a PhD means to think
  • a PhD is a process of self-realization as an independent researcher: it involves creative and ingenious self-expression which is not purely rational. Not all questions are determined in advance.

After a vote the group decided to further investigate the statement that a PhD means to think. Elucidating his statement, the PhD candidate said that this thinking of a PhD occurs when you

  1. formulate a hypothesis,
  2. draw conclusions from your data and results, and
  3. interpret these conclusions by translating them and putting them in a broader context of scientific and societal issues.

Another participant, let’s call him Chris, offered a specific case which exemplifies to him how a PhD means to think: “The other day I did some archival research to find numbers on army strength at a specific time and place. I was looking for numbers and found them. These are results.”

The group proceeded with a Socratic investigation of this example. With questions about facts, without assumptions and normative ideas in the background, participants clarified the case until they could fully project themselves into the situation from the example. Then, each participant concluded for him/herself whether this is a case of thinking as meant in the PhD and why / why not.

  • no, because Chris did not draw conclusions
  • no, because in this example there is no interpretation of the data
  • yes, because Chris had a reason to look for these numbers, i.e. to check a hypothesis about historical events
  • no, because data collection differs from “PhD-thinking”. “PhD thinking” is about larger links and connections, about providing direction and pushing science forward
  • yes, because Chris evaluated the number he found, he weighed it

These conclusions led to a fierce debate about the objectivity of data collection. Counting and finding numbers, participants argued, should happen as objective and unprejudiced as possible, ‘blind’. This is crucial for scientific research. However, this quasi mechanical counting can easily be outsourced and is therefor explicitly not essential to the kind of thinking implied in the PhD.

At the end of the hour all participants agreed that a PhD involves a special kind of thinking, but the exact nature of this thinking left us puzzled. This Socratic conversation stimulated deeper thinking on the phenomenon of the PhD, participants indicated: it provided food for thought. Their found it provocative, interesting, and stimulating .

 

If you are interested in organizing a Socratic conversation on a topic relevant to early career researchers, I invite you to take a look at the Workshop Socratic Questioning at my services page.

 

 

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://vansijl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Van-Sijl-Counseling-and-Training-Logo-300x138.png 0 0 Claartje van Sijl https://vansijl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Van-Sijl-Counseling-and-Training-Logo-300x138.png Claartje van Sijl2015-07-17 09:30:132016-04-09 07:20:30What is a PhD anyway?
1 reply
  1. Claartje van Sijl (@VanSijl)
    Claartje van Sijl (@VanSijl) says:
    July 20, 2015 at 7:00 am

    What is a PhD anyway? – blog report of a Socratic conversation that I recently facilitated @_knaw. http://t.co/QoIVYufojR #phd

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Services for

  • Academics
    • PhD Career Intervention
    • Postdoc Career Intervention
    • Scientist with heart and soul
    • How to survive your PhD
    • Working Soft in Science – Individual online course
  • Organizations / groups
    • Work Smarter, Stress Less
    • Working Soft in Science
    • Personal Leadership In Working Relationships
    • How to survive your PhD
    • Employability for PhDs

COUNSELING & TRAINING

Academics
Organizations/groups

Registrations

NOBCO
EMCC
Vereniging Filosofische Praktijk
Erkend Zacht Werken coach
Certified Logic Based Therapy Consultant
CRKBO Geregistreerd Docent
Chamber of commerce / KvK nr. 53709365

CONTACT CLAARTJE

send me an email
or call: +31(0)6 19 114 965
VAT / BTW nr. NL001648315B30

Archive

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • June 2025
  • September 2022
  • May 2020
  • March 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
© Copyright - Van Sijl Counseling & Training - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to Mail
Link to: 2 barriers to women in science and what you can do about them Link to: 2 barriers to women in science and what you can do about them 2 barriers to women in science and what you can do about them Link to: How to make hard choices? Link to: How to make hard choices? How to make hard choices?
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top
Free booklet
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    You will receive my monthly inspiration and advice in your mailbox. You can easily unsubscribe at any time. See also the Privacy Statement.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    You will receive my monthly inspiration and advice in your mailbox. You can easily unsubscribe at any time. See also the Privacy Statement.